Solvance reads a regulation article by article and hands you the policy wording you are missing, traced back to the article it rests on.
Solvance is running at Nordic insurers today. The analysis has been read and judged by the people who carry compliance inside them, and by a former head of insurance supervision.
A supervisor publishes an amendment on a Tuesday morning in March. In most companies, that Tuesday ends with someone booking a steering group for November.
A new framework lands. Somebody works through it article by article against a folder of policies written by people who have since left. It takes weeks, and at the end the honest answer to "are we covered" is still "we think so".
Manual comparison of every article against every policy, repeated each time a regulation changes or a document is revised.
You can show what you found. You cannot show what nobody thought to look for, and that is the part a supervisor asks about.
Why a policy says what it says is institutional memory. It walks out of the door when the person who wrote it does.
Everything else on this page follows from one choice about when the work happens.
What you cannot see: everything that was never retrieved. The gap is invisible to the person who asked, which means it is also invisible to the board.
What you can show: that nothing was skipped, and where every conclusion came from.
Your risk profile, your roles and your documents are counted in when the analysis is made, not when the question is put.
No article is left unanswered, so you can show that the whole framework is covered rather than the part someone asked about.
From conclusion to paragraph, and on to the passage in your own document. Material you can put in front of internal audit and the supervisor.
“Solvance Analytics has built a platform that analyses the relationships between regulations, not just the regulations themselves, with full traceability at every step. It gives insurers the ability to understand the consequences of regulatory change before it hits their operations, and to demonstrate to supervisors exactly how they reached their conclusions.”
Åsa Larson · Advisor, former head of insurance supervision at Finansinspektionen
Consultants leave you with a report. Register tools leave you with checklists. Solvance delivers the work that sits between the two, with the wording you need where your documents fall short. Adding a framework you are missing is a routine, not a project.
Around twenty frameworks. What applies to a Nordic insurer or occupational pension provider is already in the library, including the delegated acts, technical standards and guidelines underneath each one.
Structured article by article into answerable requirements, mapped to the roles that must own them, tested against your documents.
Your own documents, risk profile and positions, read exactly as they are written.
A DORA analysis produced 42 proposed policy changes. Here is one of them.
The drafted wording carries the article it rests on. The reasoning behind it is written down, and open to inspection the moment someone asks.
“Solvance has the potential to fundamentally transform that process. The most valuable aspect is the concrete proposed policy amendments, clear guidance on what is missing from our governance documents and what needs to be adjusted.”
Rosita Öhman-Qvist · Governance Manager @ Rentokil Försäkring AB
Solvance is built by people who have worked inside European insurance regulation, not by a generalist AI company that picked compliance as a market. We read Solvency II, DORA, IDD, IRRD and the EU AI Act the way a specialist would, and we are answerable for the analysis we deliver.
People who have worked on the supervisory side of the table read what we produce.
Anna-Karin Toresson Weigel
CEO and co-founder
Leads the commercial work and the customer relationships.
Jörgen Olsén
CSO and co-founder
Methodology and analytical science. Built the original analysis engine.
Product and commercial work, from what we build to how it reaches a buyer.
Builds and runs the platform the analysis is delivered in.
Monica Cramér Manhem
Insurance and reinsurance
Long experience of insurance and reinsurance, including as CEO of SiriusPoint International.
Advises on how Solvance is built and financed, so the company can carry long term commitments to the customers it takes on.
Solvance reads legacy text meaning by meaning, not keyword by keyword. A requirement is matched on what a passage actually commits you to, even when your document never uses the regulation's vocabulary.
A regulation does not land on a company, it lands on people. Each requirement is mapped to the roles that must carry it, so the work can be handed out instead of discussed.
The board gets its own, and so do the risk function, the actuarial function, IT and the data protection officer. Each one holds the obligations that reach that role, with the articles behind them.
Nobody has to read DORA end to end to find their part of it. The dossier is the part that applies to them, in the order it applies.
Where two roles both carry something, or where nobody does, it comes out as a finding rather than as a surprise. Solvency II asks for clear allocation and appropriate segregation, and this is where you evidence it.
Every article tested against every role and every policy. Three cadences keep it current.
When a framework is added or amended, and when one of your own policies changes.
Gaps, recommendations and board ready material on the cycle you already run.
Role dossiers, policy views and open search through LUMI.
The amendment published that Tuesday morning read, mapped to your obligations, and drafted against every policy in its blast radius before the coffee has gone cold. Not yet. That is the direction we are building in.
We start with one regulation and deliver a complete analysis. When you add the next, the system shows where they overlap, where they conflict, and where one tightens requirements set by another. Nothing is thrown away between them.
One framework. Solvency II, DORA, the EU AI Act, or whichever one is pressing on you right now.
A parameter document to look through, a few questions answered, and a handful of your governance documents. About an hour of your time.
The complete analysis in Solvance Prism, with proposed wording where your documents fall short, and open search across all of it.
Framework by framework, at your pace. Each one you add makes the ones already there read against a wider picture.
The first framework builds the baseline everything afterwards reads from. Nothing in it is bought a second time, and the figure is agreed before any work starts.
You pay for the work the analysis actually requires, so the cost follows the scope you choose rather than how many colleagues open it.
The library is built out one framework at a time, at your pace, and each one is read against the ones already there.
Scope decides the figure, and we put it in writing before anything is started. Adding a framework later is a routine rather than a new project.
One page on what the analysis contains and what it costs you in time. One page on why the order the work is done in decides what you can prove afterwards. English and Swedish.
The five things the analysis delivers, the three cadences that keep it current, and the one working hour a first framework costs you.
Your own information security questionnaire is completed by us as a standard part of onboarding, in the format your security function uses. It is not something you have to ask for, and it is not answered by a sales person.
“By connecting our organisational structure and governance documents to relevant regulations and industry practices through a tool like Solvance, we see a valuable support for this work. It provides excellent conditions for working proactively, identifying gaps, creating an overview, and it adapts to our organisation-specific context.”
Niklas Lindgren · Risk Manager & Data Protection Officer @ Sveland Djurförsäkringar
In 30 minutes we show you what a structured analysis of that regulation looks like for a company your size, from regulation text all the way to concrete policy amendments. If it is not better than what you have, you have lost half an hour.
Half an hour, on a regulation you are working on. No integration against your systems, and nothing to prepare.
The decisions are always yours, made by you and supported by the analysis.
